Horizons Youth Services
6 Cited authorities
Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 365 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal AnalysesHolding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO
417 U.S. 249 (1974) Cited 364 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982) Cited 333 times 16 Legal AnalysesHolding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"
California Pacific Medical v. N.L.R.B
87 F.3d 304 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 25 timesNo. 93-71039, 94-70009 Argued and Submitted August 15, 1995, San Francisco, California Filed June 19, 1996 Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson, Falk Rabkin, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-respondent. Richard A. Cohen, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CA-24067. Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, CECIL F. POOLE, and DIARMUID
Pennsylvania Transformer Tech. v. N.L.R.B
254 F.3d 217 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 6 timesFinding successorship despite a two-year production hiatus and a number of other factors not present here