Hoover, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Chair Company

    361 F.2d 283 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 24 times

    No. 10000. Argued November 4, 1965. Decided May 6, 1966. Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. R.D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Josey Hardy, Greensboro, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge. MICHIE, District Judge. This case comes before

  3. N.L.R.B. v. W.L. Rives Company

    328 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. W.L. Rives Co., 328 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1964), the court held that manufacturers of materials are not primarily engaged in the construction industry.
  4. Arthur L. Morgan Union, Local No. 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    463 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 71-1102. Argued January 14, 1972. Decided May 9, 1972. Mr. George G. West, Des Moines, Iowa, for petitioner. Mr. Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Charles E. Sykes, Memphis, Tenn., with whom Mr. William A. Harding, Lincoln, Neb., was on the