Honolulu Typographical Union No. 37

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"
  2. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected
  3. Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    356 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times
    In Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. NLRB, 356 F.2d 434, 436 (CA9), enf'g 150 N.L.R.B. 467 (1964), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1002 (1966), the court upheld the Board's determination that the handbilling there fell within the publicity proviso and thus was not unlawful, but it stated in dictum that § 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) covered the union activity.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Bldg. Serv. Emp. Int. U. No. 105

    367 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8399. October 11, 1966. Elliott C. Lichtman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C., Atty., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Roy O. Goldin, Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for respondent. Before LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of

  5. Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times
    In Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. NLRB, 310 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1962), this court remanded the case to the Board to consider the statutory meaning of coercion.
  6. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 6,997 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable