§

Honolulu Sporting Goods Co., Ltd.

239 N.L.R.B. 1277 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Honolulu Sporting Goods Co., Ltd.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Manufacturing Co.

    414 U.S. 270 (1973)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that although an employee may not be "legally bound to vote for the union and has not promised to do so in any formal sense" some "would feel obliged " to cast a union vote after having signed a union recognition slip

  4. Labor Board v. Donnelly Co.

    330 U.S. 219 (1947)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Styletek, Div. of Pandel-Bradford

    520 F.2d 275 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times

    No. 75-1017. Argued June 3, 1975. Decided August 6, 1975. Margery E. Lieber, Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. George H. Foley, Boston, Mass., with whom Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Haven Nursing Home, Inc.

    542 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "anticipatory photographing. . . . does not violate § 8 of the Act where the photographs are taken to establish for purposes of an injunction suit that pickets engaged in violence"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

    554 F.2d 996 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 24 times
    Permitting inference

  8. Russell-Newman Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    370 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times

    No. 22955. December 27, 1966. Rehearing Denied January 25, 1967. Fritz L. Lyne, Lyne, Blanchette, Smith Shelton, George C. Dunlap, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet A. Kohn, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN, COLEMAN, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. COLEMAN, Circuit Judge: The petitioner, Russell-Newman Manufacturing Company,

  9. Sta-Hi Division, Sun Chem. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 470 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 5 times

    No. 76-1513. Argued April 7, 1977. Decided August 16, 1977. Stanley R. Strauss, Washington, D.C., with whom Peter H. Kiefer, Chester H. Lopez, Jr., Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammhols Day, and Hamblett, Kerrigan, LaTourette Lopez, Nashua, N. H., were on brief, for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Fremont Mfg. Co., Inc.

    558 F.2d 889 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 5 times
    Finding improper pre-petition grant of benefits conferred soon after employer learned employees were distributing authorization cards