Honda of Mineola

5 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 873 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 23 times

    No. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Avon Convalescent Center, Inc.

    549 F.2d 1080 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 1 times

    No. 73-1323. February 11, 1977. Elliott Moore, Peter Nash, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., John S. Irving, Jr., Patrick H. Hardin, Joseph E. Mayer, Vivian A. Miller, Joseph A. Oertel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jonas B. Katz, Dennis J. Buckley, David Reichert, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and WEICK and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its supplemental

  5. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,892 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions