§

Home Pride Provisions, Inc.

161 N.L.R.B. 634 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Home Pride Provisions, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 54 times
    In James H. Matthews Co., supra, the employee in question signed an authorization card. Later the union received a letter, postmarked 11 days after the effective date for determining majority status of the union, requesting return of the employee's authorization card. Allegedly, the letter was neither written, dated, nor addressed by the employee and was originally left with an undisclosed person.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Greenfield Components Corp.

    317 F.2d 85 (1st Cir. 1963)   Cited 10 times

    No. 6033. May 10, 1963. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Seymour Strongin, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, with whom Joseph E. Lepie and Melvin Pierce, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges, and GIGNOUX, District Judge. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  6. N.L.R.B. v. H. Rohtstein Co.

    266 F.2d 407 (1st Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.