Holyoke Visiting Nurses Assn.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms
  3. Holyoke Visiting Nurses Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    11 F.3d 302 (1st Cir. 1993)   Cited 36 times
    In Holyoke, 11 F.3d at 307, the court upheld a joint employer finding based on the entity's "joint control of the... employees by, inter alia, its unfettered power to reject any person referred to it by [the employer] and its substantial control over the day-to-day activities of the referred employees."
  4. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 19 times
    In Sparks Nugget, the Ninth Circuit went further by finding that the inaccessibility exception does not apply at all in situations where customers, and not employees, are the target audience; alternatively, the court stated that, even if the exception were applicable, Lechmere would require a finding that the intended audience is presumptively not inaccessible "because the targets of the union protest do not reside on the employer's property."
  5. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"
  6. Pay'n Save Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    641 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Noting that concerns about employee dissension can be a special circumstance
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.
  8. Asociacion Hosp. Del Maestro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    842 F.2d 575 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 4 times

    No. 87-1476. Heard December 7, 1987. Decided March 30, 1988. Roberto E. Vega-Pacheco with whom Roberto O. Maldonado Nieves and Cancio, Nadal Rivera, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., with whom Harriet Lipkin, Rosemary M. Collyer, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  9. United States Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    682 F.2d 98 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that § 8 does not prohibit photography per se, only photography that has a reasonable tendency to coerce
  10. Davison-Paxon, Div. of R. H. Macy v. N.L.R.B

    462 F.2d 364 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning large and conspicuous button on sales floor