§

Hollywood Casino LLC v. Chateau Celeste, Inc.

No. 91203686 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 14, 2015)
Hollywood Casino LLC v. Chateau Celeste, Inc.

23 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 217,235 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  2. McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale

    333 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 975 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that use of pepper spray was reasonable when officer "had probable cause to believe that McCormick had committed a violent felony" and "could have reasonably determined that McCormick still posed a threat of further violence"

  3. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.

    618 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 403 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts need not strike contradictory errata revisions "if sufficiently persuasive reasons are given, if the proposed amendments truly reflect [the original testimony], or if other circumstances" justify the amendments

  4. Hambleton Bros. Lumber v. Balkin Enterprises

    397 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 267 times
    Holding that compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(e) and 30(f) is an absolute prerequisite for correcting a deposition under Rule 30(e)

  5. Pina v. Children's Place

    740 F.3d 785 (1st Cir. 2014)   Cited 169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiff's admissions in deposition undermined her claims

  6. Podell v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc.

    112 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 258 times
    Holding Rule 30(e) "places no limitations on the type of changes that may be made, . . . nor does the Rule require a judge to examine the sufficiency, reasonableness, or legitimacy of the reasons for the changes"

  7. Garcia v. Pueblo Country Club

    299 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 142 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a plaintiff must produce evidence showing that he actually applied for employment

  8. Greenway v. International Paper Co.

    144 F.R.D. 322 (W.D. La. 1992)   Cited 159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 30(e) permits only the correction of typographical and transcriptional errors

  9. Sweats Fashions v. Pannill Knitting Co.

    833 F.2d 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 163 times
    Finding that, on review of a grant of summary judgment in a USPTO opposition proceeding, "[opposer] would have us infer bad faith because of [registrant's] awareness of [opposer's] marks. However, an inference of 'bad faith' requires something more than mere knowledge of a prior similar mark. That is all the record here shows."

  10. Delaware Valley Floral Group, Inc. v. Shaw Rose Nets, LLC

    597 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 78 times
    Holding that the standard of review for the denial of a motion for reconsideration is governed by the law of the regional circuit

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 330,300 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 91,428 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

  13. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,265 times   128 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

  14. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,806 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark