Hollander Manufacturing Co., Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 369 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
N.L.R.B. v. Res-Care, Inc.
705 F.2d 1461 (7th Cir. 1983) Cited 49 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding significant the fact that a nurse "cannot cause a nurse's aide to be fired by giving her a poor evaluation or cause her to be promoted by giving her a superlative evaluation"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp.
891 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1989) Cited 13 times
Giving dispositive weight to the third factor, noting, “Buckley's argument fails under the third factor. There is no possibility of an inequitable result from retroactive application of the Board's new standard because the new standard works to Buckley's advantage.”
St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 19 times
In St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. NLRB, 708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983), we upheld Board jurisdiction over a hospital affiliated with the Sisters of Mercy, a Catholic order.
Hotel, Motel Restaurant Employees v. N.L.R.B
785 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 13 times
No. 85-7106. Argued and Submitted November 13, 1985. Decided March 25, 1986. David Rosenfeld, William A. Sokol. Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. William Stewart, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Susan Ardissan, M. Armon Cooper, Lukens, St. Peter Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor-respondent. Burger Pits, Inc. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED, KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.
Colfor Inc. v. N.L.R.B
838 F.2d 164 (6th Cir. 1988) Cited 11 times
Declining to review four contested Taft factors and concluding that substantial evidence of lack of contemporaneous understanding alone supported Board's no-impasse finding
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Flex Plastics, Inc.
726 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1984) Cited 13 times
Rejecting argument that union "inaction" was legitimate basis for withdrawal of recognition: "The Company had no evidence that the Union-employee relationship was not an active one, only that the Union-management relationship was inactive."
C.H. Guenther Son, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
427 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 21 times
No. 27495. June 1, 1970. Allen P. Schoolfield, Jr., Dallas, Tex., John H. Wood, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail C. Basker, Washington, D.C., N.L.R.B., Clifford W. Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the Court upon petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against C.H. Guenther Son, Inc., doing

Hollander Manufacturing Co., Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Finding significant the fact that a nurse "cannot cause a nurse's aide to be fired by giving her a poor evaluation or cause her to be promoted by giving her a superlative evaluation"

Giving dispositive weight to the third factor, noting, “Buckley's argument fails under the third factor. There is no possibility of an inequitable result from retroactive application of the Board's new standard because the new standard works to Buckley's advantage.”

In St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. NLRB, 708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983), we upheld Board jurisdiction over a hospital affiliated with the Sisters of Mercy, a Catholic order.

Declining to review four contested Taft factors and concluding that substantial evidence of lack of contemporaneous understanding alone supported Board's no-impasse finding

Rejecting argument that union "inaction" was legitimate basis for withdrawal of recognition: "The Company had no evidence that the Union-employee relationship was not an active one, only that the Union-management relationship was inactive."