Holiday Inn Express

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO
417 U.S. 249 (1974) Cited 366 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees
Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. Scientific Comm
523 U.S. 1020 (1998) Cited 119 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding prejudicial the potential inclusion of evidence that would have "redrawn the boundaries of the case"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Kallmann v. N.L.R.B
640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 63 times
Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice
Pace Industries, Inc. v. Natl. Lab. Rel. Bd.
118 F.3d 585 (8th Cir. 1997) Cited 13 times
No. 96-1643 Submitted December 11, 1996 Filed July 1, 1997 Myron Boe, Little Rock, AR, argued (Mark Alan Peoples, Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for Petitioners/Cross-Respondents. Bruce E. Buchanan, Little Rock, AR, argued (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Linda Dreeben, Supervisory Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, on the brief), for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Petition
Kessel Food Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
868 F.2d 881 (6th Cir. 1989) Cited 13 times
Finding judges and administrative officers do not exceed the bounds of due process when they perform investigative and judicial functions

Holiday Inn Express

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. Scientific Comm

Finding prejudicial the potential inclusion of evidence that would have "redrawn the boundaries of the case"

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

Pace Industries, Inc. v. Natl. Lab. Rel. Bd.

Kessel Food Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Finding judges and administrative officers do not exceed the bounds of due process when they perform investigative and judicial functions