§
Hogan Mfg.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp.

    429 U.S. 252 (1977)   Cited 4,434 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs need show only that "a discriminatory purpose has been a motivating factor in the decision," because, after all, "[r]arely can it be said that a legislature or administrative body operating under a broad mandate made a decision motivated solely by a single concern, or even that a particular purpose was the ‘dominant’ or ‘primary’ one."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  3. N.L.R.B. v. First Nat. Bank of Pueblo

    623 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 14 times
    Recognizing that such an inference is permissible but not permitting it in view of employee's very limited union activity

  4. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  6. Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Lipman Brothers, Inc.

    355 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6526. Heard December 6, 1965. Decided January 21, 1966. Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Murray Brown, Boston, Mass., with whom William F. Joy and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.