§

Hobbs & Oberg Mining Co., Inc., International Chemical Co. And Eastoak Coal Co.

297 N.L.R.B. 575 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Hobbs & Oberg Mining Co., Inc., International Chemical Co. And Eastoak Coal Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 341 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  3. Clinton's Ditch Co-op. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 142 times
    Finding the fact that a company complains to a contractor about problems that the company's customers had with the contractor's drivers, and that the company "expected appropriate action to be taken" against the contractor's driver did not demonstrate joint employment

  4. Mid-South Bottling Co. v. N.L.R.B

    876 F.2d 458 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 3 times
    Upholding a restoration order where "much of the equipment was simply sent to other... [affiliated] facilities"

  5. Int'l Chem. Wkrs. U. Loc. 483 v. N.L.R.B

    561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 6 times
    In International Chemical Workers Union Local 483 v. NLRB, 561 F.2d 253 (D.C. Cir. 1977), this court was explicit that "[w]hether [two entities are] joint employers" under the National Labor Relations Act "depends upon the amount of actual and potential control that" the putative joint employer "ha[s] over the * * * employees," id. at 255 (emphasis added).

  6. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,892 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions