§

Hindman Mfg. Co. of Centralia, Inc.

No. 74699256 (T.T.A.B. Apr. 8, 1999)
Hindman Mfg. Co. of Centralia, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"

  3. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Sun Oil Co.

    229 F.2d 37 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 68 times
    Adopting standard of review for decisions of Patent Office set forth in Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U.S. 120, 125, i.e., finding of fact made by TTAB "must be accepted as controlling, unless the contrary is established by evidence `which, in character and amount carries thorough conviction'"

  4. Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc.

    534 F.2d 915 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that the board was not in error in dissecting the marks by considering 38 third party registrations having the suffix "tronics" or "tronix" where the holder of the mark "Tektronix" opposed registration of the mark "Daktronics"

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,607 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"