Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.

Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless