§

Hillhaven Highland House

336 N.L.R.B. 646 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Hillhaven Highland House

8 Cited authorities

  1. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  5. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  6. ITT Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    251 F.3d 995 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing Hudgens v. NLRB, 424 U.S. 507, 96 S.Ct. 1029, 47 L.Ed.2d 196, and Eastex, 437 U.S. at 571, 98 S.Ct. 2505

  7. United Food Workers Un. L. 1036 v. N.L.R.B

    249 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 00-70156, 99-71442, 00-70189, 99-71596 and 99-71317. Argued and Submitted March 12, 2001. Filed May 17, 2001. David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, Oakland, California, for petitioner/cross-respondent UFCW Local 1036. Glenn M. Taubman, Richard J. Clair, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Springfield, Virginia, for the petitioners/intervenors. Fred L. Cornnell, Steven B. Goldstein, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Masonic Home

    892 F.2d 449 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 11 times
    Affirming Board's application of Tri-County test to invalidate no-access policy applied to off-duty employees