4 Cited authorities
Nathanson v. Labor Board
344 U.S. 25 (1952) Cited 279 timesHolding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"
Nathanson v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
194 F.2d 248 (1st Cir. 1952) Cited 2 timesNo. 4614. February 11, 1952. Louis K. Nathanson, Boston, Mass., pro se. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Harvey B. Diamond, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee. Before CLARK, WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by the Trustee in Bankruptcy of MacKenzie Coach Lines, Inc. from an order of the United States District Court
In re Mackenzie Coach Lines
100 F. Supp. 489 (D. Mass. 1951) Cited 2 timesBankr. No. 70284. September 27, 1951. Louis K. Nathanson, Boston, Mass., trustee and Henry Friedman, Boston, Mass., for trustee. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gerald Krassa, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. WYZANSKI, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for review of the order of Referee in Bankruptcy Smart, which disallowed the Board's claim. These are the facts — On January 3, 1947 the Board issued a complaint against the present bankrupt
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
136 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1943) Cited 6 timesNo. 9121. June 22, 1943. On Petition of Petitioner to Construe and Apply the Board's Order Approved by this Court. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for construction and application of an order of the Board against the Hudson Motor Car Company, which joined in the petition praying that the court adjudge the aggregate sum due certain employees of the company under the Board's order. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, A. Norman Somers