Hilary Ayers, Complainant, v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.
510 U.S. 17 (1993) Cited 12,389 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"
Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson
477 U.S. 57 (1986) Cited 6,506 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that sexual harassment may be actionable under Title VII as discrimination on the basis of sex if it is sufficiently severe and pervasive
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,575 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Pullman-Standard v. Swint
456 U.S. 273 (1982) Cited 1,615 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico
864 F.2d 881 (1st Cir. 1988) Cited 833 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a federal official who was the director of a training program could be sued in his individual capacity under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment
Spain v. Gallegos
26 F.3d 439 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 413 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding no abuse of discretion where court dismissed remaining counts for failure to prosecute after litigant "decided not to proceed" following an adverse ruling
Hall v. Gus Construction Co.
842 F.2d 1010 (8th Cir. 1988) Cited 312 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding employer liable for harassment by co-workers because supervisor knew of the harassment but did nothing
Llewellyn v. Celanese Corp.
693 F. Supp. 369 (W.D.N.C. 1988) Cited 25 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that taking medical leave without pay as a result of an intolerable work situation is a constructive discharge in the context of back pay liability

Hilary Ayers, Complainant, v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

Holding that sexual harassment may be actionable under Title VII as discrimination on the basis of sex if it is sufficiently severe and pervasive

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

Holding that a federal official who was the director of a training program could be sued in his individual capacity under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment

Holding no abuse of discretion where court dismissed remaining counts for failure to prosecute after litigant "decided not to proceed" following an adverse ruling

Holding employer liable for harassment by co-workers because supervisor knew of the harassment but did nothing

Finding that taking medical leave without pay as a result of an intolerable work situation is a constructive discharge in the context of back pay liability