Hijos de Ricardo Vela, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  2. Labor Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.

    336 U.S. 226 (1949)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S. 226, 232-33, 69 S.Ct. 541, 544, 93 L.Ed. 638 (1949), the Court declined to enforce an order requiring an employer to make its meeting hall available to a union; the Board might legitimately bar discrimination against unions, the Court said, but could not require the employer to prefer unions over other potential users.
  3. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."
  4. Morgan Precision Parts v. N.L.R.B

    444 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 8 times

    No. 30234. July 15, 1971. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Alabama Case). A.H. Gaede, Jr., John J. Coleman, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., Allen H. Feldman, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Marinor Inns, Incorporated

    445 F.2d 538 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 7 times

    No. 30573. July 14, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edward Wendel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Norman F. Burke, Orlando, Fla., for respondent. Before WISDOM, Circuit Judge, DAVIS, Judge, and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge. Honorable Oscar H. Davis, U.S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: In this unfair labor practice case the National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Victor Otlans Roofing Co.

    445 F.2d 299 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 7 times

    No. 26196. June 23, 1971. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, NLRB, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Frederick Richman, Cooper, Wyatt, Tepper Plant, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BROWNING, CARTER and TRASK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Larrell Lane, employed as a kettleman by the respondent, Victor Otlans Roofing Co., was discharged. He claimed that the true

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second