Higgins Industries, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Parma Water Lifter

    211 F.2d 258 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13770. March 8, 1954. Rehearing Denied April 13, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Edmond F. Rovner, Washington, D.C., Melton Boyd, Attys., N.L.R.B., Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Louisville Container

    209 F.2d 654 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 11781. January 27, 1954. Lewis C. Green, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on brief for petitioner. James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., Edward A. Dodd, Dodd Dodd, Smith Smith, Louisville, Ky., on brief, for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order of May 13, 1952 against the respondent Louisville Container Corporation