§

Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc

293 N.L.R.B. 84 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  4. Ahrens Aircraft, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 23 times

    No. 82-1079. Argued February 10, 1983. Decided March 28, 1983. Lawrence Odell, Patrick Duffy O'Neill, and Colorado, Martinez, Odell, Calabria Sierra, Hato Rey, P.R., on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence E. Blatnik, Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, W. Christian Schumann and Helen L. Morgan, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Horizon Air Services, Inc.

    761 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming bargaining order because the egregious actions of the employer "constitute a more than ample basis for a sound inference of future interference and/or enduring aftereffects"

  6. Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    557 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 20 times

    No. 76-3077. August 22, 1977. George E. Duncan, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen., Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Alan Banov, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before THORNBERRY, AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Keystone Pretzel Bakery, Inc.

    696 F.2d 257 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times

    No. 81-2067. Argued February 2, 1982. Reargued Before the Court In Banc November 8, 1982. Decided December 29, 1982. William Wachter, Susan Tepper Papadopoulos (argued), Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Shawe Rosenthal, Earle K. Shawe, Warren M. Davison (argued), Leslie R. Stellman, Baltimore

  8. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions