§

Hickory Creek Nursing Home

295 N.L.R.B. 1144 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Hickory Creek Nursing Home

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service, 841 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1988), the court suggested that prophylactic measures such as the union's qualification on eligibility for office were supported by "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests...."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    613 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that invitations to employees to disclose their union activities and sympathies constitute interrogation

  8. Asociacion Hosp. Del Maestro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    842 F.2d 575 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 4 times

    No. 87-1476. Heard December 7, 1987. Decided March 30, 1988. Roberto E. Vega-Pacheco with whom Roberto O. Maldonado Nieves and Cancio, Nadal Rivera, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., with whom Harriet Lipkin, Rosemary M. Collyer, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Saint Vincent's Hosp

    729 F.2d 730 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-7203. April 9, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Bernstein and Ellen A. Farrell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Hopkins, Lang, Simpson, Robinson Sommerville, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. Honorable Edward S. Smith, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

  10. Tama Meat Packing Corp v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    575 F.2d 661 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    No. 77-1573. Submitted February 15, 1978. Decided May 12, 1978. Fred W. Elarbee, Atlanta, Ga., argued, for petitioner; Elarbee, Clark Paul, Atlanta, Ga., on brief. Lynne Deitch, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations