§

Hewlett Packard Co.

25-CA-028591 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 5, 2003)
Hewlett Packard Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Sutherland Lumber Company

    452 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times

    No. 18932. November 16, 1971. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Avrum Marcus Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Susan J. Sherman, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Robert C. Canfield, Carl E. Enggas, Allan L. Bioff, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent; Watson, Ess, Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., of counsel. Before KILEY and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges