§

Hesston Corporation, Inc.

175 N.L.R.B. 96 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Hesston Corporation, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Prince Macaroni Manufacturing Co.

    329 F.2d 803 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 6171. March 31, 1964. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Stuart Broad, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. William F. Joy, Boston, Mass., with whom John J. Desmond, III, and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

  4. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 31 times
    In Chicago Rawhide, this Court concluded that: "[n]either mere cooperation, preference, nor possibility of control constitute unfair labor practices; and the Board may not infer conduct that is violative of the Act from conduct that is not, unless there is a substantial basis, in fact or reason, for that inference."

  5. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Syracuse Color P

    209 F.2d 596 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596, we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Zimnox Coal Company

    336 F.2d 516 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15335. September 14, 1964. Leo N. McGuire, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Henry M. Wick, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Dominic J. Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio (Coleman Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio, Richard J. Smith, Delisi, Wick Vuono, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief; Jack B. Josselson, Schmidt, Effron, Josselson

  7. Hotpoint Co. v. N.L.R.B

    289 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 13151. May 5, 1961. Theophil C. Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., Norbert E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., Vincent A. Johnson, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Abraham A. Dash, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent