§

Hertz Rent-A-Car

297 N.L.R.B. 363 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Hertz Rent-A-Car

9 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Pay'n Save Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    641 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Noting that concerns about employee dissension can be a special circumstance

  3. Burger King Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1053 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that the challenged policy must be enforced in a “consistent and nondiscriminatory fashion”

  4. Midstate Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning a particular type of T-shirt

  5. Virginia Elec. Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that the conflict between competing unions justifies the employer's request that employees wear small and less gaudy buttons

  6. Davison-Paxon, Div. of R. H. Macy v. N.L.R.B

    462 F.2d 364 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning large and conspicuous button on sales floor

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Rooney

    677 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 80-7332. Argued and Submitted December 15, 1981. Decided February 25, 1982. Margery Lieber, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Robert G. Servell, Washington, D.C., on brief. Matthew D. Ross, Brundage, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, and Robert M. Cassel, Specter, Berman, Cassel Carter, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for respondents; Charles Klinedinst, Petit Martin, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before

  8. Fabri-Tek, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.2d 577 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times
    Upholding employer's objection to employees wearing IBEW vari-vue buttons when employer did not ban all buttons

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Harrah's Club

    337 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Harrah's Club, 337 F.2d 177 (9th Cir. 1964) (Harrah's Club), we reviewed a National Labor Relations Board (Board) order that concluded that section 7 of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), granted a casino's public contact uniformed employees a right to wear union buttons or pins, even though the wearing of the union buttons was not part of any concerted campaign to organize the employees, promote collective bargaining, or gain better working conditions.