§
Hermet, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Clement Brothers Company

    407 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times

    No. 25319. February 12, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Michael N. Sohn, Linda Sher, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Griffin, Jr., Overton A. Currie, William T. Wood, Smith, Currie Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., for Clement Brothers Co., Inc., Mark G. Kaplan, Boston, Mass., Angoff, Goldman, Manning Pyle, Boston, Mass., for International Union

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Urban Telephone Corporation

    499 F.2d 239 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that actions of a single employee were fairly attributable to the union under agency principles even though he was not formally designated as an agent

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Kostilnik

    405 F.2d 733 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 12 times

    No. 17121. Submitted December 16, 1968. Decided January 16, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Thomas Silfen, Attys., NLRB, on the brief), for NLRB. Michael Hahalyak, Robert T. Salera, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before SEITZ, ALDISERT and STAHL, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to section 10(e) of the National

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  7. Department Store Food Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    415 F.2d 74 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 17413, 17476. Argued June 12, 1969. Decided September 10, 1969. Arnold T. Olena, Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods Goodyear, Buffalo, N.Y., for Department Store Food Corp. of Pa. Joseph E. Finley, Metzenbaum, Gaines, Krupansky, Finley Stern, Cleveland, Ohio, for Retail Clerks International Assn., Local 1538, AFL-CIO. Angelo V. Arcadipane, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman

  8. N.L.R.B. v. SuCrest Corporation

    409 F.2d 765 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 114-116, Dockets 32433-32435. Argued October 30, 1968. Decided March 24, 1969. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Iran D. Lanoff, Atty., NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Morton L. Deitch, New York City (Stroock Stroock Lavan and David L. Finkelman, New York City, on the brief), for respondent SuCrest Corp. Joel Field, New York City (Schulman, Abarbanel Kroner and Howard

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zoe Chemical Co.

    406 F.2d 574 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    No. 29, Docket 31989. Argued October 9, 1968. Decided January 13, 1969. William J. Avrutis, Atty., NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Zoe Chemical Co., Inc. Before FRIENDLY, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Over five

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Electric Products Co.

    283 F.2d 54 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 13176. Argued June 9, 1960. Decided September 29, 1960. Richard H. Frank, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, and Julius Helfer. Stephen