Heritage Container, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 426 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"
  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
  4. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"
  5. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  6. V & S ProGalv, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    168 F.3d 270 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that a bargaining order "was the proper remedy where the Board found several violations of § 8 and, as such, the likelihood of ensuring a fair election was slight"
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

    574 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 38 times
    Striking employee swerved in front of and blocked another employee's car; second employee threw egg
  8. Gibson Greetings, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    53 F.3d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 93-1304, 93-1425. Argued September 14, 1994. Decided May 19, 1995. Paul Grossman argued the cause for petitioner Gibson Greetings, Inc. With him on the briefs were Zachary D. Fasman, Lawrence Peikes, Frank H. Stewart, and Brian P. Gillan. Paul L. Styles, Jr., argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Intern. Broth. of Firemen Oilers. William M. Bernstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frederick L. Feinstein, Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Champ Corp.

    913 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the employer's conduct effectively derailed contract negotiations, thereby prolonging the economic strike and converting it into an unfair labor practice strike
  10. N.L.R.B. v. D D Enterprises, Inc.

    125 F.3d 200 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Remanding to Board for reconsideration of whether prior unfair labor practices continued to influence employees' support of union for purposes of decertification