§

Hercules Powder Co.

127 N.L.R.B. 333 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Hercules Powder Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  2. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    270 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. NLRB, 270 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir. 1959), the court, in sustaining the Board's finding that a shut-down by the employer was not motivated by a fear that a sudden strike would endanger plant and personnel, stated that "to apply hindsight in the light of what later occurred would not be a true assessment of the company's motives.

  3. American Brake Shoe v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    244 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times
    In American Brake Shoe Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 489, we recognized that the right to engage in a lawful strike is a protected concerted activity.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Augusta Chemical Co.

    187 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13359. February 13, 1951. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D.C., for petitioner. W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alside, Inc.

    192 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Alside, Inc., 6 Cir., 192 F.2d 678, 679, Judge Hicks pointed out that where the president of a local union was acting as a "front" or agency for a union in filing charges against the employer, the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 152(5), 159(h), did not give the Labor Board jurisdiction to enter a complaint or to issue a cease and desist order where non-Communist affidavits had not been filed in compliance with law.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Happ Bros.

    196 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    No. 13756. April 15, 1952. Norton J. Come, Attorney, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. N.L.R.B., and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Cubbedge Snow, Macon, Ga., Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), in which the National Labor

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leach

    234 F.2d 400 (3d Cir. 1956)   Cited 1 times

    No. 11877. Argued June 7, 1956. Decided June 18, 1956. Fred U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel-Mallet Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Sherman T. Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Paul, Lawrence Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition for enforcement