§

Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc.

202 N.L.R.B. 866 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  2. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    417 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry I. Siegel, we held that we will examine the context of statements and the atmosphere in which they were made to determine whether they constitute "a permissible forceful argument in opposition to the union or a veiled threat to the employees in the event the union should win the election."

  3. Henry L. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry L. Siegel v. NLRB, 328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964), we held that an employer violates § 8(a)(1) if he bludgeons his employees into furnishing copies of their statements.

  4. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    340 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 221, Docket 29058. Argued December 4, 1964. Decided January 13, 1965. Osmond K. Fraenkel, New York City, (Hays, St. John, Abramson Heilbron, New York City, William Abramson, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Hans J. Lehmann, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty. N.L.R.B.), for respondent. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, (James J. Graham, New York City, of counsel)