Henning and Cheadle, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Dobbs Houses, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 531 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 25 times
No. 19536. December 11, 1963. Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., Robert McD. Smith, Birmingham, Ala., William Fortas, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner, Lange, Simpson, Robinson Somervlle, Birmingham, Ala., Fowler Fortas, Memphis, Tenn., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Robert Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.
258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958) Cited 18 times
Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."
Cleaver-Brooks Mfg. Corporation v. N.L.R.B
264 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1959) Cited 17 times
Holding that a strike protesting the replacement of a supervisor where the evidence showed the strike to be based on mere personal antipathy toward a new foreman was unprotected activity.

Henning and Cheadle, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Dobbs Houses, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."

Cleaver-Brooks Mfg. Corporation v. N.L.R.B

Holding that a strike protesting the replacement of a supervisor where the evidence showed the strike to be based on mere personal antipathy toward a new foreman was unprotected activity.