§

Hendon & Co., Inc.

197 N.L.R.B. 813 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Hendon & Co., Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  4. Local No. 152 v. N.L.R.B

    343 F.2d 307 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times
    In Local No. 152 there was evidence (1) that the union honestly but mistakenly believed it represented a majority of the employees in the unit when it sought recognition, and one week thereafter actually attained majority status, (2) the company responded that it was not interested in talking to the union, (3) the company did not in any manner dispute the union's claim of majority representation, (4) the company ignored the union's demand for recognition, and (5) the union petitioned the Board for an election.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Quick Shop Markets, Inc.

    416 F.2d 601 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times
    In Quick Shop Markets, the Seventh Circuit agreed with the fact-finder's conclusion regarding pretext and noted that the employer did not care to investigate or determine the identity of the employee responsible for the cash shortages.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. I. Posner, Inc.

    304 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 332, Docket 27342. Submitted April 23, 1962. Decided July 3, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Leo N. McGuire, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Leight, Drimmer Weinstein, New York City, and Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit

  7. Scobell Chemical Company v. N.L.R.B

    267 F.2d 922 (2d Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times

    No. 324, Docket 25374. Argued May 7, 1959. Decided June 18, 1959. Richard L. Epstein, Rochester, N.Y. (Harris, Beach, Keating, Wilcox, Dale and Linowitz, Rochester, N.Y., on the brief), for petitioner. Nier, Doyle Nier, Rochester, N.Y., for Scobell Chemical Co., Inc. William G. McGee, Thomas H. Ramsey, Buffalo, N.Y., for General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board. Scully, O'Brien McDermott, Rochester, N.Y., for Local Union No. 118. Christopher J. Hoey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board