Heidi B.,1 Complainant, v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,404 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption
  2. Schnellbaecher v. Baskin Clothing Co.

    887 F.2d 124 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 284 times
    Holding "[b]ecause both the EEOC charge and the ensuing investigation were insufficient to put the defendants on notice of any intention of the plaintiffs to make allegations of class-wide discrimination in their complaint, the district judge was correct in dismissing the charges of class-wide discrimination."
  3. Lindale v. Tokheim Corporation

    145 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 129 times
    Holding that the court cannot take literally that before an employee quits he must seek legal redress for the condition that drove him to quit
  4. Willner v. University of Kansas

    848 F.2d 1023 (10th Cir. 1988)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that a motion to recuse cannot be based exclusively on adverse rulings
  5. Brock v. Georgia Southwestern College

    765 F.2d 1026 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 57 times
    Holding "that plaintiff can meet its burden of going forward by showing that the teachers compared are in the same discipline and that their job is to teach classes to students in that discipline."
  6. E.E.O.C. v. Maricopa Cty. Community College

    736 F.2d 510 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that EPA was violated because the defendant did not compensate plaintiff with neither "back pay or retroactive seniority"
  7. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,702 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  8. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,956 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"