§
Hedison Mfg. Co.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Stowers v. Mahon

    429 U.S. 834 (1976)   Cited 170 times
    Dismissing petitioners' constitutional challenges to the Regional Rail Reorganization Act because the 1976 amendments gave the Special Court jurisdiction over such claims, but retaining jurisdiction over petitioners' contentions that certain ICC regulations were invalid under the Act

  4. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  5. Title Guarantee Co. v. N.L.R.B

    534 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 60 times
    Holding statements of employees and union representatives obtained in NLRB investigation exempt from disclosure under Exemption 7 until completion of administrative and judicial proceedings

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  7. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515

  8. New England Medical Center Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 35 times
    Denying FOIA disclosure on the merits, under exemption 7, for the same reasons

  9. Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

    558 F.2d 1137 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Holding statements made by low-level supervisor to be coercive

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc.

    374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 34 times
    Finding inference that supervisor who walked past a sign every day saw that sign was reasonable and provided substantial evidence for the NLRB's decision