§
Heck'S Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Committee on Masonic Homes, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    556 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Finding that union authorization cards were not "compiled for law enforcement purposes," and stating that "`law enforcement purposes' must relate to some kind of formal proceeding, and one that is pending"

  2. Pacific Molasses Co. v. NLRB

    577 F.2d 1172 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding privilege inapplicable to "mechanically compiled statistical report which contains no subjective conclusions"

  3. Madeira Nursing, v. N.L.R.B., Region No. 9

    615 F.2d 728 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that authorization cards are privileged from disclosure to employer

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Finesilver Manufacturing Company

    400 F.2d 644 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    Relying on context of antiunion hostility

  5. Lundy Packing Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    549 F.2d 300 (4th Cir. 1977)   Cited 4 times

    No. 76-1330. Argued December 7, 1976. Decided January 26, 1977. Thomas G. Greaves, III, Mobile, Ala., James M. Miles, Greenville, S.C. (Haynsworth, Baldwin Miles, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for petitioner. Alan Banov, Atty., N.L.R.B. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Irving M. King, Chicago, Ill. (Thomas D. Allison

  6. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,553 times   564 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party