Heckethorn Manufacturing Co.

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Southwire Company v. N.L.R.B
383 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 34 times 2 Legal Analyses
Discussing an employer's right to express an opinion regarding unionization rather than its right to unionize
N.L.R.B. v. Hawthorn Company
404 F.2d 1205 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 15 times
No. 19248. January 3, 1969. Ronald W. Egnor, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Egnor. Frederick S. Kullman, of Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent, Hawthorn Company; Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., was on the brief with Frederick S. Kullman, New Orleans, La. Donald
Luxuray of N.Y., Div. of Beaunit v. N.L.R.B
447 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1971) Cited 12 times
Holding that exhibition of anti-union film expressing negative opinion of past local unions and speculating that similar abuses might accompany future unionization was protected speech under § 8(c)