Heartland Industrial Partners, LLC

21 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
  2. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
  3. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 318 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  4. Berkley v. U. S

    416 U.S. 970 (1974)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that "officers are not required to announce at every place of entry" and approving an entry where officers made one announcement at the front door while seconds later other officers entered another
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925

    460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 37 times

    No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Central Pennsylvania Regional

    352 F.3d 831 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 3 times
    Affirming Board decision that subcontracting and joint venture clause was not protected by construction industry proviso
  9. Sheet Metal Wkrs, v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 417 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming NLRB finding that union violated Section 8(e) where it attempted to secure a union-only clause as part of existing collective bargaining agreement by denying employers who refused discretionary wage and benefit concessions
  10. Amax Coal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    614 F.2d 872 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "doing business under § 158(e) refers to a continuing business relationship, not to the sale of a facility
  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,083 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB