§
Hearst Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  5. Hartsell Mills Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 41 times

    No. 4592. April 10, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hartsell Mills Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition denied; order modified and enforced. Edwin A. Lucas, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Benjamin W. Parham and Parham Taylor, all of Oxford, N.C., and Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Bertram Edises, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., (Charles

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Geigy Co.

    211 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13686. March 17, 1954. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Thomas R. Haley, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nathan R. Berke, Attorney, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Richard Ernst, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. City Dyeing

    178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Electric City Dyeing Co., 178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950), this court had occasion to rule on a comparable situation where the employer alleged that certain employees were discharged for unsatisfactory work whereas the Board made a finding, in which we concurred, that the dismissals were for union activity.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Company

    357 F.2d 919 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    No. 6548. Heard February 9, 1966. Decided March 15, 1966. Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion Griffin, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. Fernando Ruiz-Suria, San Juan, P.R., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and MARIS and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. By designation. COFFIN, Circuit Judge. On this petition for enforcement of an order of the National