Hearst Corp.

23 Cited authorities

John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,771 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.
362 U.S. 330 (1960) Cited 140 times
Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.
293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 48 times
In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle
211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 54 times
Subcontracting union work
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. General Electric Co.
332 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 36 times
No. 253, Docket 28364. Argued January 27, 1964. Decided May 26, 1964. Nordlinger, Riegelman, Benetar Charney, New York City (David L. Benetar, Thomas F. Hilbert, Jr., H.H. Nordlinger, Martin Zeiger, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Baker Diamond, Stamford, Conn. (Bertram Diamond, Stamford, Conn., of counsel); Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision
United Steelworkers of Amer. v. Reliance Univ
335 F.2d 891 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 34 times
In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.
Section 152 - General duties
45 U.S.C. § 152 Cited 1,255 times 1 Legal Analyses
Imposing the duty not only to "maintain" agreements but also to "make" them

Hearst Corp.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

Subcontracting union work

In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.

Imposing the duty not only to "maintain" agreements but also to "make" them