§

Haynie Electric Co., Inc.

225 N.L.R.B. 353 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Haynie Electric Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347

    417 U.S. 1 (1974)   Cited 129 times
    Holding when a remedy is found to be an abuse of discretion "remand to the agency for reconsideration ... is ordinarily the reviewing court's proper course"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  4. Food Store Emp. U., Loc. No. 347 v. N.L.R.B

    476 F.2d 546 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 20 times
    Upholding Board refusal to extend bargaining order to unrepresented store

  5. N.L.R.B. v. City Yellow Cab Company

    344 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that at times where no representatives of management were present, switch-board operators were not supervisors in part because company officers were at all times reachable by phone

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Stark

    525 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 14 times
    In NLRB v. Stark, 525 F.2d 422 (2nd Cir. 1975) cert. denied 424 U.S. 967, 96 S.Ct. 1463, 47 L.Ed. 734 (1976) the second circuit held that the ALJ should have the authority to sequester the alleged discriminatees and failure to have exercised that discretion in favor of sequestration would have been an abuse of discretion.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

    257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery

    215 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11236. Argued May 17, 1954. Decided August 16, 1954. Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank G. Smith, Clearfield, Pa. (Frank A. Whitsett, Clearfield, Pa., Smith, Maine, Whitsett Lee, Clearfield, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY,

  9. Poultry Enterprises v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    216 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14892. November 24, 1954. A.C. Wheeler, C.J. Thurmond, Wheeler, Robinson Thurmond, Emory F. Robinson, C.D. Stewart, Gainesville, Ga., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Fannie M. Boyls, John Francis Lawless, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge,