§

Hawaii Meat Co., Ltd.

139 N.L.R.B. 966 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Hawaii Meat Co., Ltd.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. National Labor Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex MFG

    245 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, 245 F.2d 594, we held that (1) the duty of the Company to bargain with the certified Union did not terminate with the calling or execution of the strike, (2) the Company had been guilty of unfair labor practices in refusing to bargain collectively with the Union and in interfering with the employees in the exercise of their right to organize and bargain collectively, and (3) the Union had not been guilty of any practice justifying employer in breaking off bargaining negotiations.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.

    209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Valley Die Cast Corporation

    303 F.2d 64 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Valley Die Cast Corporation, supra, 303 F.2d 4, affirmed findings of 71 discriminatory discharges and refusals to rehire.

  7. National L.R.B. v. Giustina Bros. L

    253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Giustina Bros. Lumber Co., 253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958), we held that Rule 102.46(b) prohibited the respondent from raising an issue before the Ninth Circuit where respondent's objection had been "so ambiguous as to be totally ineffective" in "adequately appris[ing]" the Board of the excepting party's intentions.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United States Cold Storage Corp.

    203 F.2d 924 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that an employer who insists on negotiating by mail or that a union submit its proposals in writing has unlawfully refused to bargain

  9. Swarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    303 F.2d 668 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14753. May 23, 1962. Joseph L. Halberstein, Marion, Ohio (Strelitz, Halberstein Mitchell, Marion, Ohio, Hubert T. Campbell, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and STARR, Senior District

  10. International Union of Elec., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    303 F.2d 359 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 13695, 13700. Argued January 26, 1962. Decided May 15, 1962. John G. Wayman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Irving Olds Murphy, Gifford, Graham, MacDonald Illig, Erie, Pa., Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner Erie Resistor Corp. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C. (Benjamin C. Sigal, Winn I. Newman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for International Union of Electrical, Radio, Machine Workers, Local 613, AFL-CIO. Melvin Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General