§

Harvey Aluminum, Inc.

147 N.L.R.B. 1287 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Harvey Aluminum, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Capitol Fish Company

    294 F.2d 868 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Housekeeping Statute "cannot be construed to establish authority in the executive departments to determine whether certain papers and records are privileged," nor can it "bar a judicial determination of the question of privilege or a demand for the production of evidence found not privileged"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Madrid Mfg. Co.

    215 F.2d 908 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In New Madrid the business was transferred to a new employer, which was held liable for the unfair labor practices committed by its predecessor before closing.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  4. O.F. Shearer Sons v. Cincinnati Marine Serv

    279 F.2d 68 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13949. May 31, 1960. Robert T. Keeler, Cincinnati, Ohio (Nicholas L. White, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant. Philip S. Olinger, Cincinnati, Ohio (Earl T. Barnes, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee. Before SIMONS, POPE and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. Appellant, libellant below, is a partnership which owned and towed barges on the Ohio River. Appellee-respondent is a corporation which owns and manages a harbor in the Cincinnati basin area of the Ohio

  5. Site Oil Company of Missouri v. N.L.R.B

    319 F.2d 86 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 17130. June 24, 1963. Richard Marx, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners; Murray Steinberg and Charles Kopman, St. Louis, Mo., with him on the brief. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief. Before SANBORN and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENSON, District Judge

  6. E. Anthony Sons v. National Labor Rel. Board

    163 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1947)   Cited 10 times

    No. 9385. Argued March 11, 1947. Decided June 23, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 89. On Petition for Review and on Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by E. Anthony Sons, Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board wherein the Board sought a decree enforcing the Board's order. Petition to set aside order of Board denied and petition of Board granted. Mr. Elisha

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys