§

Harvard Industries, Inc.

294 N.L.R.B. 1102 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Harvard Industries, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

  4. Conair Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    721 F.2d 1355 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 48 times
    In Conair, the Board, in marked contrast to this case, had specifically found that no other remedy could "dissipate the lingering effects of [Conair's] massive and unrelenting coercive conduct" which "ha[d] foreclosed any possibility of holding a fair representation election."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company

    262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 66 times
    In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.

  6. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    407 F.2d 1357 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 38 times
    Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"

  7. Free-Flow Packaging Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    566 F.2d 1124 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that failure to grant a wage increase could be lawfully motivated by a good-faith effort "to comply with the requirements of law"

  8. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel

  9. American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 815 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In American Boiler, the complaint alleged a fabrication clause in a collective-bargaining contract was being unlawfully applied by the parties, but the issue of legality of the clause was not passed on by the Board, even though the validity of the clause would be dispositive and was fully litigated by the parties; this Court remanded to the Board to determine the legality of the clause.

  10. Rea Trucking Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    439 F.2d 1065 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times

    No. 25087. March 19, 1971. William B. Wyllie (argued), of Williams, Skopil, Miller, Beck Wyllie, Salem, Or., for petitioner. Daniel Katz (argued), N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, N.L.R.B.; George H. Davies, Seattle, Wash., for respondent. Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Rea Trucking Company has petitioned this court to review

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,894 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions