§

Hartman and Tyner, Inc. d/b/a Mardi Gras Casino and Hollywood Concessions, Inc.

359 N.L.R.B. 895 (N.L.R.B. 2013)
Hartman and Tyner, Inc. d/b/a Mardi Gras Casino and Hollywood Concessions, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 655 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Mulhall v. UNITE HERE Local 355

    618 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 113 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff’s First Amendment rights were "at imminent risk of invasion" because an agreement his employer entered into with a labor union "substantially increase[d] the likelihood" that he would be unionized against his will

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Regional Home Care Services, Inc.

    237 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that the Court is limited to determining whether the Board acted within its discretion in the conduct of elections

  5. Chinese v. Natl. Labor

    224 F. App'x 6 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 06-1159, 06-1206. April 24, 2007. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Steven D. Atkinson, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud Romo, Cerritos, CA, for Petitioner. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Ronald E. Meisburg, David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB) General Counsel, Washington, DC, for