Hartford Hospital

9 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 372 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 481 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  4. American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    499 U.S. 606 (1991)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"
  5. Staten Island University Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    24 F.3d 450 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 13 times
    Rejecting employer's unsubstantiated claim that wage "whipsawing" would jeopardize patient care
  6. Local 144 v. N.L.R.B

    9 F.3d 218 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 212, 251 and 269, Dockets 93-4008(L), 93-4014 and 93-4044. Argued September 15, 1993. Decided November 4, 1993. James I. Wasserman, New York City (Vladeck, Waldman, Elias Engelhard, P.C., of counsel), for petitioner Local 144, Hotel, Hosp., Nursing Home Allied Services Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO. Richard J. Silber, Albany, N Y (Harder Silber and Bergan, of counsel), for petitioner New York State Nurses Ass'n. William M. Bernstein, Office of Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter,

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Catherine McAuley Health Center

    885 F.2d 341 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 5 times
    In Catherine McAuley Health Ctr., we found geographical proximity relevant in that it can affect the community of interests among employees of separate facilities. 885 F.2d at 347.
  8. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    685 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 1297, 1442, Dockets 82-4081, 82-4091. Argued June 10, 1982. Decided July 21, 1982. Ronald H. Shechtman, New York City (Gordon Schechtman, Richard M. Betheil, New York City, of counsel), for intervenor-respondent. Robert M. Kaufman, New York City (Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, Richard H. Block, New York City, of counsel), for Hospital Ass'n of New York State, amicus curiae. Patricia S. Hofstra, Chicago, Ill., for American Hospital Ass'n, amicus curiae. David H. Diamond, New York City (Guggenheimer

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second