§

Harter Equipment, Inc.

280 N.L.R.B. 597 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Harter Equipment, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 470 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 320 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  5. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 322 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 231 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  7. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  8. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  9. Newspaper Drivers v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers

    395 U.S. 923 (1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 1267. May 26, 1969. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. David Previant and David L. Uelmen for petitioner. Philip T. Van Zile II and Daniel J. Tindall, Jr., for Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn., and Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for National Labor Relations Board, respondents. Reported below: 404 F. 2d 1159.

  10. Inter-Collegiate Press, v. N.L.R.B

    486 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 23 times

    Nos. 72-1573, 72-1749. Submitted September 10, 1973. Decided October 25, 1973. Alvin D. Shapiro, Kansas City, Mo., for Intercollegiate Press. William O. Eisler, Kansas City, Mo., for Bookbinders. William DuRoss, III, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Talbot Smith, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation