Harry's Television Sales and Service

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  4. Roland Co. v. Walling

    326 U.S. 657 (1946)   Cited 173 times
    In Roland Co. v. Walling, 326 U.S. 657, 66 S.Ct. 413, 90 L.Ed. 383 (1946), the Court held inter alia that a business engaged in commercial wiring, electrical contracting for industry, and repair and replacement of electric motors and generators did not constitute a "retail or service establishment."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Shurett

    314 F.2d 43 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 19784. January 30, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga., Yonge, Beggs Lane, Bert H. Lane, Pensacola, Fla., Wilson, Branch Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, GEWIN, and BELL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The record