§

Harry Asato Painting, Inc.

20-CA-124382 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 19, 2014)
Harry Asato Painting, Inc.

21 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Lorance v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.

    490 U.S. 900 (1989)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "when a seniority system is nondiscriminatory in form and application, it is the allegedly discriminatory adoption which triggers the limitations period"

  4. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  5. Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Todd

    461 U.S. 260 (1983)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that "[n]othing in the legislative history of § 8(f) indicates Congress intended employers to obtain free the benefits of stable labor costs, labor peace, and the use of the union hiring hall. Having had the music, he must pay the piper."

  6. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.

    641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"

  8. Frankl v. HTH Corp.

    693 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that employer withheld requested documents in bad faith where union repeatedly explained why limited production was inadequate and where union signed confidentiality agreement to address employer’s concerns

  9. Southern Calif. Painters v. Best Interiors

    359 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 27 times
    Recognizing an employer's payment of "union wages and benefits" as relevant to whether the employer adopted a CBA by its conduct

  10. Grondorf, Field, Black Co. v. N.L.R.B

    107 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 15 times
    Remanding the case to allow the companies the opportunity to make that showing

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,365 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials

  13. Section 103-55.6 - Public works construction; apprenticeship agreement

    Haw. Rev. Stat. § 103-55.6

    (a) A governmental body, as defined in section 103D-104, that enters into a public works contract under this chapter having an estimated value of not less than $250,000, shall decrease the bid amount of a bidder by five per cent if the bidder is a party to an apprenticeship agreement registered with the department of labor and industrial relations for each apprenticeable trade the bidder will employ to construct the public works, and in conformance with chapter 372. The lowest total bid, taking the