Harrah's Club

9 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.

    415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 95 times
    In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Harrah's Club

    403 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21689. November 12, 1968. Solomon I. Hirsh (argued), Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Nathan Berke (argued), of Severson, Werson, Berke Bull, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge. Honorable E. Avery Crary, United States

  5. N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company

    302 F.2d 342 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times
    Excluding "the period during which the bargaining relationship was suspended by litigation of the Company's unfair labor practices"
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Crest Leather Manufacturing Corp.

    414 F.2d 421 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    No. 26645. July 22, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Rodin, Baruch A. Fellner, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Irving Abramson, Ruth Weyand, Melvin Warshaw, Washington, D.C., for intervenor. Joseph Fleming, Parker D. Thomson, Miami, Fla., Paul Thomson, Miami

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Harrah's Club

    408 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1969)

    No. 21689. March 13, 1969. Solomon I. Hirsh (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert M. Lieber, Atty., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Nathan R. Berke (argued) of Severson, Werson, Berke Bull, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before: MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge. Honorable E. Avery Crary, United States District Judge

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Small Tube Products, Inc.

    319 F.2d 561 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 2 times

    No. 13984. Argued November 8, 1962. Decided February 28, 1963. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing July 18, 1963. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel Leiter, Boston, Mass. (Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and AUGELLI, District

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sam'l Bingham's Son Mfg. Co.

    227 F.2d 751 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 1 times

    No. 12606. December 20, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel and Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Epstein, Edes Rosen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This cause comes to us on petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directing that the respondent, Sam'l Bingham's Son Mfg. Company, cease and desist from