Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Leedom v. International Union

    352 U.S. 145 (1956)   Cited 26 times
    Articulating the "full payment rule"
  2. N.L.R.B. v. David Buttrick Company

    399 F.2d 505 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 20 times

    No. 6636. August 22, 1968. Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion Griffin, Washington, D.C., Atty., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mark G. Kaplan, Boston, Mass., with whom Samuel E. Angoff and Angoff, Goldman, Manning Pyle, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for intervenor. John J. Delaney, Jr., Boston, Mass., with whom Murray S. Freeman and Nutter, McClennen

  3. Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In Retail Clerks International Assn. v. NLRB, supra, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) BURGER explained the Board's policy on "managerial employees": "The Board also excludes from the protections of the Act, as managerial employees, 'those who formulate, determine, and effectuate an employer's policies,' AFL-CIO, [120 N.L.R.B. 969, 973 (1958)], and those who have discretion in the performance of their jobs, but not if the discretion must conform to an employer's established policy, Eastern Camera and Photo Corp., 140 N.L.R.B. 569, 571 (1963) (store managers who could set prices are not managerial).
  4. N.L.R.B. v. David Buttrick Company

    361 F.2d 300 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. David Buttrick Co., 361 F.2d 300 (1st Cir. 1966) (Buttrick I), a milk distributor, Buttrick, had refused to bargain with Local 380 because of loans totaling $4,700,000 made by the Fund to Whiting.
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.