§

Harding Glass Industries, Inc.

216 N.L.R.B. 331 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Harding Glass Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  4. Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times

    No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN

  5. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  6. Sullivan Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    479 F.2d 1270 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 72-2104. Argued April 18, 1973. Decided June 19, 1973. Charles Hampton White, Cornelius, Collins, Higgins White, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for petitioner. Steven C. Kahn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Elliott Moore, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and LAMBROS, District Judge. Honorable Thomas D. Lambros, United States District Judge for the Northern District

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Austin Powder Company

    350 F.2d 973 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15620. September 22, 1965. Vivian Asplund, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Roderick C. Hunsaker, Cleveland, Ohio, and Arthur R. Donovan, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge and McCREE, District Judge. McCREE, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board