§

Harco Trucking, LLC

344 N.L.R.B. 478 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Harco Trucking, LLC

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. United Steelworkers v. N.L.R.B

    983 F.2d 240 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that factual findings may be reversed only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable fact-finder could fail to find the contrary

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. Vencare Ancillary Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 01-2165, 01-2300. Argued: October 23, 2003. Decided and Filed: December 11, 2003. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Kennedy, Circuit Judge. John v. Nordlund, (argued and briefed), Fairfax, CA, Leslie M. Mitchell (briefed), Law Office of Leslie M. Mitchell, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner. Meredith L. Jason, (argued and briefed), Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed), Kira Vol (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Before KENNEDY and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; ALDRICH

  8. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Recognizing significance of employer's history of § 8 violations

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferguson

    257 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 38 times

    No. 16973. June 30, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Ralph W. Malone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is a Petition by the Board for enforcement of an Order, 118 N.L.R.B. No. 30, finding the Employer, Shovel Supply Company, guilty of 8(a)(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), violations and requiring the reinstatement of four

  10. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  11. Section 78.050 - Commencement of corporate existence

    Nev. Rev. Stat. § 78.050   Cited 2 times

    1. Upon the filing of the articles of incorporation pursuant to NRS 78.030 and the payment of the filing fees, the Secretary of State shall issue to the corporation a certificate that the articles, containing the required statement of facts, have been filed. From the date the articles are filed, the corporation is a body corporate, by the name set forth in the articles of incorporation, subject to the forfeiture of its charter or dissolution as provided in this chapter. 2. Neither an incorporator